Informed Health Decisions Require Access To Information

- Dr Geert Vanden Bossche

I do not live my life being dictated to by people who are too scared or too compromised to think for themselves - people who accept any narrative that this is - the way - and the only way - in other words.

That is called fundamentalism in my book.

And history clearly shows us that fundamentalism and fundamentalist approaches never end well.

I generally play the long game in my life - on most things.

Health is one area where I definitely play the long game.

I approach my health with - a multi faceted approach - of constant learning - unlearning - and growing, and being open to evidence based approaches.

I have stated many times I am pro choice in life.

People need to have choice in a free healthy functioning society - and they need to have access to information to make informed choices.

Pro choice in most of the global population has been compromised by coercive and aggressive fear campaigns to get populations to take one course of action... and one course of action only.

Or else.

Is that healthy...?

Is that about choice...?

It's been one big propaganda and fear campaign based on flawed assumptions and science out of a box on the payroll supported by media and politicians who - you guessed it - are on the payroll.

This campaign removed freedoms and gave governments even more control over their populations.

I write a lot about RISK.

When we understand risk - we can then make more informed decisions about managing risk in our lives as it is - not as it may be purported to be.

I spent hundreds of hours (thats how much time I invested in informing myself... and it is ongoing) before I was comfortable and informed enough about understanding the level of known risks here - let alone obviously not knowing the unknown risks - of joining the 99% of people who chose - or were coerced - or forced - into the mass health approach program.

I was open to the answers - whatever way they came.

Why not take the medicine?

Because for me and my situation - a healthy person without comorbidities - it would be an uninformed decision to make.

And I mean a REALLY uninformed decision to make.

It would add more risk to me and my life to take it.

Why would anyone take a bigger risk to do something then that they didn't need to do?

The so called treatments didn't work as they were supposed to.

Yes they helped to 'alleviate severe symptoms'... in people who were at risk.

These people were UNHEALTHY PEOPLE = generally people with 2+ comorbidities that included; obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, stress and anxiety etc etc.

But the fact remains that I am in the 1%.

And no matter how you slice or dice that, 1% will always be 1%.

99% will think you are wrong - or crazy - or both!

Thinking for yourself at these times is an unpopular game.

It's a game you play alone.

It is not a game about 'agreement' - it's a game that simply asks;

"What are the real risks here?"

It is incredibly empowering and enabling (good coach speak) as you break free of the hold and the control mechanisms that keep populations in limited belief and thinking patterns.

(even more good coach speak).

There has been, and still is, a lot of pressure on those of us who have patiently thought this through and who have not taken the treatments based on taking the time, doing the work, and being logical about what the real - and imagined - and plain wrong - assumptions and risks are here.

We all make our own decisions in life.

The fact is that in this case, the facts have been - and still are - being distorted by propaganda campaigns with clear agendas.

The key message today?

Think for yourself and don't get caught up in fundamental approaches - in any area of life - that limit your freedom of choice or expression.

𝘿𝙧. 𝙂𝙚𝙚𝙧𝙩 𝙑𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝘽𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚, 𝘿𝙑𝙈, 𝙋𝙝𝘿 𝘾𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙨:

𝘎𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘝𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘉𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘋𝘝𝘔 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘮, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘗𝘩𝘋 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘝𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘏𝘰𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘮, 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺. 𝘏𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘥𝘫𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘵 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺.

𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘢, 𝘎𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘴 (𝘎𝘚𝘒 𝘉𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘴, 𝘕𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘴 𝘝𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴, 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘢𝘺 𝘉𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘴) 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘙&𝘋 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵.

𝘎𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘪𝘭𝘭 & 𝘔𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘎𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘍𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯’𝘴 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘏𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘩 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 (𝘜𝘚𝘈) 𝘢𝘴 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘖𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘳; 𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘝𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 (𝘎𝘈𝘝𝘐) 𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘢 𝘢𝘴 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘌𝘣𝘰𝘭𝘢 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘳.